Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=943
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-11 16:05 ------- On the DRM portion can you look at the work Paul has done, it is much cleaner and less intrusive, you are also using the old method which is deprecated now in the kernel, the new method is available in Pauls patch in the -mm kernel, maybe Paul can generate a patch against 2.6.11.... My feeling on this now is that we should change to generating hashes for SHM handles for *all* platforms, having it different on 32 and 64 bits isn't going to help thing, make it break obviously for everyone and we'll find out if we can use this method or not ... I'd like to merge the DRM into the kernel and see who complains and maybe provide a command line option to fall back to the old 32-bit handle for 32-bit systems in case somebody breaks badly... I think between the two of you a clean solution should be possible, breaking the ABI between X and DRI clients isn't as bad as breaking the kernel/userspace boundard but I'd like to keep the 32-bit ABI the same if possible but I guess it might not be, I've no issues with telling someone to upgrade X and DRI at the same time from snapshots.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel