On Sunday 01 May 2005 06:41, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > On Sun, 1 May 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > Vladimir Dergachev writes: > > > >> * the R300 driver derived from it appears under the same > >> license due to the notices left over from R200 files > >> (as we originally thought to merge the code in R200). > >> > >> This needs approval from everyone who contributed to R300 - > >> please let me know ! > > > > What exactly needs approval? The current license, or are you > > proposing a change to the license? > > Just wanted to confirm that everyone is ok with MIT/X11 license. > It was never explicit before - my fault, I was having too much fun playing > with the code :)
I always thought it was explicit, at least for me - I didn't just copy&paste blindly ;) So yes, I'm obviously okay with that license. cu, Nicolai
pgpd4cRidutV2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
