> > Why is that case invalid? I may have DRM=y so I get DRM on my > PCI graphichs card. Then I might load an agp module in order > to use agp on *some other* agp card. I have no problem with DRM=y,AGP=m being > invalid for the common > single-card setup, but there are multi-card setups too. Not that > I need this special case personally - I have two cards but don't use modules.
Yes but the support costs for me of allowing that second case aren't worth it, if people have a special case they don't lose anything by having AGP supported DRM in the kernel or AGP in the kernel all the time.. whereas I don't have to answer a load of questions from people whose AGP cards stop working because they build DRM into the kernel and AGP as a module... Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie Linux kernel - DRI, VAX / pam_smb / ILUG ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
