On 7/1/05, Nicolai Haehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it's a bug on our (i.e. the driver's) side, we should fix it, whether or > not Xglx itself is in a usable state. It's likely that Xglx hits code paths > that aren't used by most programs.
Xglx is working pretty well. I'd suggest using it as a test case for your r300 work. It exercises a large number of OpenGL features some of which are not comonly used. It is also a good thing to compare to since it works without problems on the ATI drivers. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fXgl -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel