On 7/1/05, Nicolai Haehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it's a bug on our (i.e. the driver's) side, we should fix it, whether or
> not Xglx itself is in a usable state. It's likely that Xglx hits code paths
> that aren't used by most programs.

Xglx is working pretty well. I'd suggest using it as a test case for
your r300 work. It exercises a large number of OpenGL features some of
which are not comonly used. It is also a good thing to compare to
since it works without problems on the ATI drivers.

http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fXgl

-- 
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to