On 7/12/05, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 12 July 2005 11:17, Jon Smirl wrote: > > On 7/12/05, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 12 July 2005 10:03, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > Is there a way to build DRI exactly like X needs from the mesa tree or > > > > can this only be done instead the X tree? If I made the right set of > > > > stubs could I build in the mesa tree? Do I need to define > > > > GLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA? > > > > > > Huh? How is 'make linux-dri' insufficient? > > > > If I follow all of the make files it looks like linux-dri is using a > > glx from the mesa tree instead of the one from xorg. That's what > > GLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA controls. > > > > The imake files turn it on: > > lib/GL/glx/Imakefile: XMESA_DEFINES = -DGLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA > > lib/GL/mesa/drivers/x11/Imakefile: XMESA_DEFINES = -DGLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA > > The "glx from the Mesa tree" is the GLX client side library. It used to live > in xc; now it doesn't. src/glx/x11 is the canonical location for the GLX > client library. It is, in other words, exactly what X needs.
So GLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA is old? I just did a 'make World' and it didn't appear in the logs. This is the new one, GLX_USE_MESA? -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
