I've been watching the R300 CVS commits, looking forward to a day when we
might be able to see good free 3D drivers for today's cards.

I have a thought though, which might be fuelled by ignorance of ARB_f_p
or of the ATI hardware. Don't hesitate to tell me why I'm wrong...
can't FP_OPCODE_SGE and FP_OPCODE_SLT be rewritten to use the destination
as a temporary, thereby eliminating the need for a real temporary which
may be important for a large/ complex program ?

If so it also seems that the remaining FP_OPCODEs already implemented can
be rewritten to avoid a temporary in some (most?) cases.

Nick.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to