On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 14:58 +0200, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 11:01 +0100, pedro.lixo wrote: > > > >>By the way, if i do the override that won't do nothing, in terms of > >>amount of memory visible to GPU, right? > > > > No, it will only affect what the driver thinks, and if that doesn't > > correspond with what's actually there and/or the hardware can handle, > > bad things will happen, which is why the override is usually bad and the > > patch you encountered which disables it is generally a good idea. > Maybe the driver should be changed so it can output a more precise > message, so people don't think that the ram is misdetected (e.g. > something like "detected 256MB, using 128MB").
Yeah, that'd be good. > Also, the 128MB limit should just not be overridable, since we KNOW the > driver can't cope with it (imho, otherwise allowing override is a nice > idea, you can for instance simulate performance with cards which have less > memory, though you could argue only smaller than detected values are useful, > as long as the driver always detects the memory amount correctly). There's no question that the override is useful for developers, the question is whether it isn't more harm- than useful for users. > And, the driver also limits texture memory to only be useable up to > 128MB, and I think this is not necessary (as textures are always blitted > using the gpu and the memory used by them never touched directly by the > cpu) or is it? Indeed, that memory would probably be useful for textures for now, but maybe CPU access to textures in the framebuffer will be necessary in the future? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel