On Wednesday 23 November 2005 18:32, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mer, 2005-11-23 at 11:46 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 07:48, Michael Frank wrote: > > > Testing 2.6.15-rc2 in-kernel DRM, why still no > > > mach64 support which works fine for me from > > > snapshots/cvs? > > > > Because it's still insecure. > > Michael - If you've got a Mach64 and you want it > mainstream you need to add code which validates the > command stream passed to the chip is valid. There is code > like this in the VIA driver and the Mach64 needs > something similar to verify you aren't doing things like > DMAing patches into the kernel with the graphics card but > only using commands that are "safe". >
Thank you Alan, I had a look at the via driver and will work on the mach64 driver. Michael ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
