On 2/13/06, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments? > > > > > > Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact PCI ID (well, lspci stupidly > > > suppresses the ID entirely, but the string seems to match the one that > > > Dave Jones reports) may be unrelated. > > > > Dave's patch removes the entry for the card with the 0x5b60. > > According to his bug report, Mauro has a Radeon X300SE that should > > have the 0x5b70 according to pci.ids from pciutils and that doesn't seem > > to be claimed by the DRM driver (and the dmesg from the bug report > > confirms that the radeon DRM driver didn't claim to be responsible for > > this card). > > The X300SE (mine at least) is a dual head card, with a 0x5b60 _and_ a 0x5b70 > > Dave >
The secondary id is just a place holder for the windows driver so dualhead will work on windows 2000. Neither the drm nor the xorg DDX uses the secondary id. Alex ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
