Rune Petersen [2006-06-18 02:27]: > Tilman Sauerbeck wrote: > > Rune Petersen [2006-06-17 23:38]: > > > >> I'm having problems with the ARL instruction. > >> It appears to mostly return 0. > > > > Yes. It would probably help if you could document in which cases it > > works reliably and in which cases it doesn't :) > > Something very strange is going on with ARL: > > I have an array with all non-zero values. > > I do an ARL on any given value within the array. > > > I read the array myArray[addr.x] and I allways get the value at index 0. > > if I add an offset myArray[addr.x + <offset>] where addr.x + <offset> > > "array size" provided addr.x is the correct value, I get 0. > > Looks to me like there is a bounds check on arrays that work correctly, > but the actual array lookup is broken. > > Is this at all possible?
Interesting, I can also reproduce this behaviour. So it seems like ARL is working correctly, but reading from ADDRESSes is broken. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
pgpnLYCFg6XXP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
