Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 08:39 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>   
>> The current code does its best to figure out what modes are available and 
>> tries to pick a good one for each display.  It sounds like you're mainly 
>> concerned with the actual mode picking, not the mode and output detection 
>> and enumeration?  If so, that's a pretty easy change to make.  But if 
>> you're also worried about the kernel building mode lists, then we'll have 
>> bigger changes to make...
>>     
>
> I'm worried that the EDID we get from the monitor is bogus and needs to
> be overriden.
>   
How often do that happen?

There is the alternate solution of assuming that EDID is correct,
and provide an override when it isn't. So anyone with a good monitor
get a nice display by default.  Those with a defective lying monitor
may have to add a "resolution=640x480" parameter to their
kernel command line to get out of the black screen modus.
This shifts the bother to those with a bad monitor, who then are
free to get pissed off at their monitor vendor . . .

Helge Hafting

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to