> > > cheers, > > > Kristian > > > > > Kristian, > > This is OK with me. It will add an extra malloc / free for every buffer > > object creation / destruction, > > but will make it easier to maintain in the future, (and we can get rid > > of the padding for future expansion). > > Exactly, I took out the pad fields in the patch. I think it's a > reasonable tradeoff, since we have a library abstraction barrier here > and the objects aren't tiny to begin with.
I can't see any problems with this, who has the time to do it? I'm up the walls with real life.. Dave. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
