On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, seventh guardian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Hellström
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Hi.
>  >
>  >  I've pushed the intel-post-reloc branch with the following stuff:
>  >
>  >  1) Full backwards compatibility.
>  >  2) A new reloc type 1, which is applied _after_ all validations and with
>  >  slightly different format.
>  >  3) If the buffer is idle, type 1 relocations are performed using the new
>  >  kmap_atomic_prot_pfn if it's available.
>  >  4) If the buffer is busy, It's never mapped, and relocations are
>  >  performed using a single dword 2D blit, and we never have to idle the
>  >  buffer. This comes at a cost of an additional single MI_FLUSH after all
>  >  blit-relocations have been performed.
>  >
>  >  This could help avoid pre-validation relocation processing, race
>  >  conditions due to the relocatee not being on the unfenced list when
>  >  relocs are applied and unnecessary buffer idling.
>
>  I can confirm that x86-64 compilation is fixed. Thanks!
Sorry, wrong topic..

>  Cheers,
>   Renato Caldas
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to