On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:05:08 +0200 "Alexander van Heukelum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 10:46:22 +1000, "Dave Airlie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > Hi, > > > > So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm > > tree in the kernel, > > > > a) it lives under char. > > b) everything in one directory. > > c) header files in one directory. > > d) no header files exposed to userspace. > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=7df9a948d0f849466e3de259cccb49bc54cbad68 > > > > is a proposal to create drivers/gpu/drm, (I may move AGP in there as > > well later). It also creates per-driver subdirs. > > Looks like a lot more suitable place! I just wonder if drivers/video/drm > would be even more logical? I think gpu is better - we are seeing various GPU as CPU accelerator toolkits appearing and assuming the AMD one ends up open source we will end up with gpu/something that isn't video. Remember GPU = Grahi^WGeneric Processing Unit ;) Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
