On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:59 pm Tiago Vignatti wrote: >> Simon Thum escreveu: >> > But all this in the kernel is an impedance mismatch to me. What could it >> > buy us we don't have today? >> >> Improve heavy-load behavior -- no jumping pointer. >> >> (BTW, your mouse acceleration proposal [0] doesn't do it at all.) >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> [0] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=17545 >> This doc says that it improves the heavy-load behavior, but I'm >> failing to see it. Can you be more specific? > > Right, and it's actually fairly common in other OSes. It sounds like the > biggest chunk of additional code will be dealing with acceleration; I'm not > sure how complex the latest algorithms are... Also input transformation is > an unknown, but it's a bit dubious anyway... >
Input transform shouldn't matter, as long as you aren't warping the cursor around corners etc.. the mouse should still move on the screen the same, its only when you click or drag something with it that the X server needs to transform it to get to the right window. Dave. > Jesse > _______________________________________________ > xorg mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
