On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 02:04 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 15:48 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > On 2008.10.16 23:27:12 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 13:16 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > > > From 4aab96c10fca2d5a3f89e56a4d6a96c6125cf932 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Zhenyu Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:32:32 +0800
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix cliprects leaking in drm_rmdraw()
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c |    7 +++++--
> > > >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c 
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c
> > > > index 70b15d1..7f8e392 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c
> > > > @@ -76,11 +76,14 @@ int drm_rmdraw(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, 
> > > > struct drm_file *file_priv)
> > > >  {
> > > >         struct drm_draw *draw = data;
> > > >         unsigned long irqflags;
> > > > +       struct drm_drawable_info *info;
> > > >  
> > > > +       info = drm_get_drawable_info(dev, draw->handle);
> > > >         spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->drw_lock, irqflags);
> > > >  
> > > > -       drm_free(drm_get_drawable_info(dev, draw->handle),
> > > > -                sizeof(struct drm_drawable_info), DRM_MEM_BUFS);
> > > > +       drm_free(info->rects, info->num_rects * sizeof(struct 
> > > > drm_clip_rect),
> > > > +                       DRM_MEM_BUFS);
> > > > +       drm_free(info, sizeof(struct drm_drawable_info), DRM_MEM_BUFS);
> > > >  
> > > >         idr_remove(&dev->drw_idr, draw->handle);
> > > 
> > > That get_drawable_info should be under the spinlock, right?
> > > 
> > 
> > yes, right. Here's the updated one. Thanks!
> > 
> > From 4b74a8a2213f1211e7a0054a40f3dda582bd0177 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Zhenyu Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:05:00 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix cliprects leaking in drm_rmdraw()
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c |    7 +++++--
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c
> > index 70b15d1..4a794d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drawable.c
> > @@ -76,11 +76,14 @@ int drm_rmdraw(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, 
> > struct drm_file *file_priv)
> >  {
> >     struct drm_draw *draw = data;
> >     unsigned long irqflags;
> > +   struct drm_drawable_info *info;
> >  
> >     spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->drw_lock, irqflags);
> >  
> > -   drm_free(drm_get_drawable_info(dev, draw->handle),
> > -            sizeof(struct drm_drawable_info), DRM_MEM_BUFS);
> > +   info = drm_get_drawable_info(dev, draw->handle);
> > +   drm_free(info->rects, info->num_rects * sizeof(struct drm_clip_rect),
> > +                   DRM_MEM_BUFS);
> > +   drm_free(info, sizeof(struct drm_drawable_info), DRM_MEM_BUFS);
> 
> Is it safe t ocall drm_free under the spinlock? It seems like a bad idea
> to me...

It's safe as far as I can tell.  spinlock debugging hasn't triggered,
which seems pretty conclusive.  Pushed.

-- 
Eric Anholt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to