On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 09:33 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote: > Keith, > > What you actually are doing here is claiming copyright on code that > other people have written, and tighten the export restrictions. > kmap_atomic_prot_pfn() appeared long ago in drm git with identical code > and purpose, but with different authors, and iounmap_atomic is identical > to kunmap_atomic.
Yeah, I just stuck my usual license header on it and didn't think about authorship. I'll fix that, once we figure out what the appropriate name is. But, as this code is clearly a trivial adaptation of the existing kernel code, it should carry a GPLv2 license. I'm also not particular as to the EXPORT restriction, I was just following the EXPORT advice given for the other newly exposed kernel symbols we're using. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
