http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18609


Will Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Comment #5 from Will Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-11-18 17:31:01 PST ---
That patch doesn't help on my system, unfortunately.

Background: this is a Cantiga (8086:2a42 (rev 03)) chipset machine, running
Fedora kernel-2.6.27.5-119.fc10.x86_64, which includes the patch you listed:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/kernel/F-10/drm-next-intel-irq-test.patch

Shortly after starting X, something causes it to freak out (xrandr mode switch
or VT switch seem to trigger it pretty good) and start generating ridiculous
number of interrupts. The kernel then has to disable the card's IRQ.

Watching /proc/dri/0/i915_gem_interrupt etc. show that it's generating
something like 60,000 interrupts per second:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ while true; do grep 'Interrupts'
/proc/dri/0/i915_gem_interrupt ; sleep 1; done
Interrupts received: 14635063
Interrupts received: 14697264
Interrupts received: 14754781
(etc.)

Kernel trace looks like this:

irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27.5-118.fc10.x86_64 #1

Call Trace:
<IRQ>  [<ffffffff81083207>] __report_bad_irq+0x38/0x7c
[<ffffffff81083453>] note_interrupt+0x208/0x26d
[<ffffffff81083b80>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xbb/0xeb
[<ffffffff8101309e>] do_IRQ+0xf7/0x169
[<ffffffff81010933>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2e
<EOI>  [<ffffffff8105e59d>] ? tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick+0x2ec/0x301
[<ffffffff8100f1f1>] ? cpu_idle+0x2a/0x10b
[<ffffffff8131ed7d>] ? rest_init+0x61/0x63

handlers:
[<ffffffff8123ae36>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0xb3)
[<ffffffff8123ae36>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0xb3)
[<ffffffffa0090334>] (e1000_intr+0x0/0x13b [e1000e])
Disabling IRQ #16
irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27.5-118.fc10.x86_64 #1

Call Trace:
<IRQ>  [<ffffffff81083207>] __report_bad_irq+0x38/0x7c
[<ffffffff81083453>] note_interrupt+0x208/0x26d
[<ffffffff81083b80>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xbb/0xeb
[<ffffffff8101309e>] do_IRQ+0xf7/0x169
[<ffffffff81010933>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2e
<EOI>  [<ffffffff8103e2ae>] ? finish_task_switch+0x39/0xc9
[<ffffffff8103e2a6>] ? finish_task_switch+0x31/0xc9
[<ffffffff813304a0>] ? thread_return+0x3d/0xd9
[<ffffffff8105e814>] ? tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick+0x171/0x179
[<ffffffff8100f2cd>] ? cpu_idle+0x106/0x10b
[<ffffffff8131ed7d>] ? rest_init+0x61/0x63

handlers:
[<ffffffff8123ae36>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0xb3)
[<ffffffff8123ae36>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0xb3)
[<ffffffffa0090334>] (e1000_intr+0x0/0x13b [e1000e])
[<ffffffffa02ac455>] (i915_driver_irq_handler+0x0/0x1a7 [i915])
Disabling IRQ #16

So, yeah. Not fixed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to