On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 04:54:00PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:43 +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > > > Should I apply both patches or only the second one (the one that adds > > the 'break;')? I applied both and I was still getting the IRQ storms. > > This is also on a GM965. > > It shouldn't have mattered. At this point, I'm curious if we're running > into trouble because of interrupt sharing. We've had good reports from > people using MSI on GM965, notwithstanding the errata which says they're > unreliable. It may be that our driver/linux uses them differently enough > that they work fine. Here's a patch which re-enables MSI for 965GM. Use > this in place of the other two patches and let us know if it works. In > other words, revert back to anholt/for-airlied and apply this patch:
This patch seems to work fine here (T61, GM965). Current linus tree (master) shows the problem while drm-intel/for-airlied + this patch doesn't. Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
