On Thursday 11 December 2008 04:28:48 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:16 pm vehemens wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 December 2008 03:52:08 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > >...
> > >New commits:
> > >commit 9583c099b4a08b49e03f7b461c344b6d277fd262
> > >Author: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
> > >Date:   Wed Dec 10 15:47:28 2008 -0800
> > >
> > >    Revert "Merge branch 'modesetting-gem'"
> > >
> > >    This reverts commit 6656db10551bbb8770dd945b6d81d5138521f208.
> > >
> > >    We really just want the libdrm and ioctl bits, not all the driver
> > >    stuff.
> > >...
> >
> > Could you help me out and explain why we don't want the merge?
>
> Because it pulled in a bunch of driver code that probably isn't ready (at
> least I didn't want to merge it w/o acks from Dave, Jerome and Stephane). 
> I just posted a more minimal patch earlier today.

I can understand not merging code when it's not ready, but that begs the 
question on who would be affected at this point given the way most 
distributions are handled :?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to