On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 17:49 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 15:08 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > This limits reuse to 16MB per cache level to try and reduce application > > memory consumption. > > Is 16MB based on any measurements at all?
Nope. It's random. > I don't like this patch. I'd prefer to have us figure out bugs that > make the cache grow overly large, and free old buffers (which we *still* > haven't done), instead of having static limits that'll just hide failure > so that you end up with both poor performance and excessive memory > consumption. No argument; I've been using this patch to see what impact it has on performance, but I'm not strongly in favor of actually using it. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
