* Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 13:34 -0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 05:48 -0800, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:39:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, i've reverted the commit for now. Could you please send
> > > > > a 'dmesg' from the bootup with the failed driver? By all
> > > > > likelyhood an ioremap failure causes a driver failure.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > See below (drm says it initalized though...):
> > > > 
> > > > [    0.000000] Linux version 2.6.29-rc6-00006-g17581ad (@verona) (gcc 
> > > > version 4.2.4) #87 Sun Mar 1 13:42:28 GMT 2009
> > > > [    0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:
> > > > [    0.000000]   Intel GenuineIntel
> > > > [    0.000000] PAT WC disabled due to known CPU erratum.
> > > 
> > > Looks like PAT is getting disabled on this platform. Can you 
> > > send the output of /proc/cpuinfo please.
> > 
> > Does this mean we failed an ioremap()? We still should not fail 
> > a device ioremap _ever_. We should just fall back to UC and be 
> > done with it. We may emit a warning if we consider it 
> > troublesome, but we should never ever break working drivers 
> > really.
> > 
> 
> No. We don't break ioremap. We try to fallback on UC_MINUS 
> here. But, there is something wrong happening in that path, 
> that is resulting in this issue. I am looking at that right 
> now.

ah, ok.

> I have found another problem with this particular patch, on 
> one of test systems. So, let us keep the revert until I fix 
> what looks like two different problems here.

ok.

        Ingo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to