On Friday 22 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 16 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13329
> > Subject             : cifs_close: NULL pointer dereference
> > Submitter   : Luca Tettamanti <kronos...@gmail.com>
> > Date                : 2009-05-16 16:28 (1 days old)
> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124249133701702&w=4
> 
> Fixed by 703a3b8e5c01cf6fb33c6d8dc99905f889a4e992.
> 
> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13298
> > Subject             : modprobe ipmi_si hangs under 2.6.30-rc5
> > Submitter   : Ferenc Wagner <wf...@niif.hu>
> > Date                : 2009-05-12 21:28 (5 days old)
> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124216379407177&w=4
> 
> Fixed by 9a2845c453d170e4e9b1437fa671dbf39b0e7bd8.
> 
> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13297
> > Subject             : kernel panic -  not syncing : fatel exception in 
> > interupt
> > Submitter   : rob <r...@housetosell.net>
> > Date                : 2009-05-12 19:34 (5 days old)
> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124216126903309&w=4
> 
> This should be fixed by e3b29f05124b07303088795396ff858811d2acb8.
> 
> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13177
> > Subject             : 2.6.30-rc2-git7 build problem
> > Submitter   : Martin Knoblauch <spamt...@knobisoft.de>
> > Date                : 2009-04-21 13:39 (26 days old)
> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124032163602132&w=4
> >               http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/56
> 
> This one really looks like a compiler bug (the undefined symbol is an 
> internal gcc one: ".L192"). And the driver that gets it (kl5kusb105) has 
> not actually had any changes since 2.6.29 - although header files that it 
> includes obviously do have some, so it's entirely possible that some 
> infrastructure change causes it to trigger.
> 
> Martin hit another bug with his compiler (an ICE in gcc, fixed by commit 
> 26a9a418237c0b06528941bca693c49c8d97edbe), which is why I'm so willing to 
> blame that.
> 
> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13107
> > Subject             : LTP 20080131 causes defunct processes w/2.6.30-rc1
> > Submitter   : Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Date                : 2009-04-09 15:43 (38 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: 
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b3bfa0cba867f23365b81658b47efd906830879b
> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123929187208953&w=4
> >               http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/10/193
> > Handled-By  : Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> This one seems to have become "not-a-bug". Yes, LTP used to check that you 
> cannot send SIGSTP to init, but people do want to send signals to init 
> (especially when they are inside pid-namespace containers), and as long as 
> it's only a LTP test that already got modified (and not some actual 
> real-life usage), I'm considering this a "test failed because it was 
> testing for behavior that we want to change" at least for now.

Thanks a lot, this really helps! :-)

I've closed all of the bugs above.

Best,
Rafael

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to