On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 09:46 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: 
> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:23:12 +0200
> Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:17 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: 
> > > I've been working on coding up the server and client side of
> > > SGI_video_sync, OML_sync_control and SGI_swap_control.  I came up
> > > with this set of new protocol (against the dri2-swapbuffers branch)
> > > to support the new requests.
> > > 
> > > We still need to change the DRI2SwapBuffers request to handle the
> > > various OML bits before it gets merged.
> > > 
> > > To summarize:
> > >   DRI2GetMSCReq - get MSC triple
> > >   DRI2WaitMSCReq - wait on an MSC count or divisor/remainder
> > >   DRI2WaitSBCReq - wait on a swap count or all pending swaps
> > 
> > Waiting in the X server will make it quite unlikely that the client
> > will be notified within a reasonable timeframe from when vertical
> > blank actually occurs. Won't this jeopardize the usefulness of the
> > functionality?
> 
> As they're mainly used for throttling drawing, I don't think so.  But I
> also don't see a way to avoid it.  In the composited case, compositor
> interaction will be necessary, and even for non-redirected windows,
> the client doesn't know which CRTC it's on w/o racing with the server.

Waiting in the server doesn't solve the latter problem, does it? The
window could move to another CRTC while it's waiting.


> > > - compositor interaction; in the compositor case the display server
> > >     will be incrementing frame count based on compositor drawing
> > > rather than vblank events
> > 
> > I think that's a bad idea, as it will confuse apps if the compositor
> > misses a frame or renders the app window more than once per frame.
> 
> It seems to match what people want though; so far we've heard from
> Soren and Robert and both want to know when the pixels are actually
> displayed for various apps.  W/o compositor interaction I don't see how
> we can do that.

I'm not arguing there should be no protocol between the compositor and
clients, but I'm arguing that the frame counter probably isn't
appropriate for this.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to