* Thomas Schlichter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> > Functionality-wise this looks fine to me; whether the core sysfs
> > changes are acceptable I can't judge, though.
>
> OK, I think I should have addressed your comments. Unfortunately I had
> to use a little "hack" to make pci_mmap_page_range() work for sysfs
> and proc. I placed a "private" pointer in the beginning of both
> per-file private structures. So this pointer can be accessed
> independent from the caller. I hope this is acceptable.
>
> I dropped the ioremap() and set_memory_wc() patches, I could not
> implement reference counting for them and it may interact too much
> with existing GPU drivers.
>
> Again, this series should not change the current behavior if either
> MTRR is disabled or PAT is enabled. But it helps in the case that MTRR
> is enabled and PAT is not available.
>
> What should be done now to get this series on the right "track"?
Can we eliminate mtrr_add_unaligned() as Suresh suggested, and still
make it work on your testbox?
Once that's done i'll look at putting it into the x86 tree for testing.
The acks of Suresh/Venki/Jan would be nice to have.
Ingo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
