Suresh Siddha wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 21:31 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Here's a quick & dirty version, totally untested. A cleaner approach > > would be to separate the WC mapping routines and hide the return > > -EINVAL in arch specific code... > > Jesse How about this patch? Doing this in x86 is cleaner. > > I would like Acks/sign-offs-by Thomas, Eric and Jesse, if it is ok with > this patch and works.
Hmm, at this point I already was more than a week ago: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125537770514713&w=2 OK, I also modified ioremap() and set_memory_wc() but your patch is just part of what I did there... And Eric Anholt answered: > Seems like we should install an MTRR instead. Requiring userland to set > up the MTRR on the kernel's behalf is backwards. Where I totally agree with him. Regards, Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
