Excerpts from Jesse Barnes's message of Wed Nov 18 17:58:42 +0000 2009: > From 8adb52b4529e777d4df0356bc2c8ef5453c2322e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@jbarnes-desktop.localdomain> > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:56:25 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: let pin routine figure out appropriate alignment > > When this code got moved out of intel_pipe_set_base, it grew a forced > alignment of 256k, which wasn't always correct. Remove that and let the > pin routine figure out the correct alignment for the object (it should > do this in just about every case).
I thought the only reason why pin() took an alignment parameter was so that we could specify a minimum alignment of 64k for untiled scan out buffers. Are we confident that this is not the case? -ickle -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
