On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Maarten Maathuis <madman2...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> - Without this change I get a general protection fault.
>> - Also use PTR_ERR where applicable.
>
> I just want to make sure I understand, but really the only bit of this
> patch that matters is:
>
>> @@ -556,9 +559,10 @@ int ttm_tt_swapout(struct ttm_tt *ttm, struct file 
>> *persistant_swap_storage)
>>                if (unlikely(from_page == NULL))
>>                        continue;
>>                to_page = read_mapping_page(swap_space, i, NULL);
>> -               if (unlikely(to_page == NULL))
>> +               if (unlikely(IS_ERR(to_page))) {
>
> ^^ these two lines where we are testing for NULL but should be
> checking for an error?

Yes, that's the critical bit. As you can see we were already doing
this for ttm_tt_swapin.

>
>> +                       ret = PTR_ERR(to_page);
>>                        goto out_err;
>> -
>> +               }
>
> If that is true and the rest is just nice cleanups then I'm okay with it,.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
>
> I'll need Thomas's ack on this also.
>
> Dave.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to