W dniu 25 lutego 2010 10:46 użytkownik Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> napisał: > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 10:42 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> Dave, we have some commits in drm-linus that are not present in >> drm-radeon-testing. Maybe this is the case with other active branches >> as well, don't know. >> >> Could you rebase branches to be more clear, please? Maybe rebasing >> agains .33 even? > > I think it's great to keep branches based on the last release as long as > possible. It allows testing DRM changes easily without pulling in random > other changes.
OK, I don't insist on 2.6.33. But that should not be the case when we have few patches commited to drm-linus and few to drm-radeon-testing. It makes some work impossible. -- Rafał ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
