On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:38:59 +0100 Rafa Miecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +#define wait_interruptible_timeout(wq, timeout)
>     \
> +({                                   \
> +    long ret = timeout;                      \
> +                                    \
> +    DEFINE_WAIT(wait);                      \
> +    prepare_to_wait(&wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);       \
> +    if (!signal_pending(current))                  \
> +        ret = schedule_timeout(ret);            \
> +    finish_wait(&wq, &wait);                   \
> +                                    \
> +    ret;                             \
> +})

It's often a mistake to use signals in-kernel.  Signals are more a
userspace thing and it's better to use the lower-level kernel-specific
messaging tools in-kernel.  Bear in mind that userspace can
independently and asynchronously send, accept and block signals.

Can KMS use wait_event_interruptible_timeout()?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to