On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Two wrong choices don't make a right. > > > > So unmerge it. > > That's what I told people I can do (I'd just revert that commit).
Read it more strongly: drop nouveau from your tree entirely. Don't give me any "not a solution" nonsense about that. The problem is entirely that your expectations for interface stability [1] in your tree do not match nouveau's development model and will not for the forseeable future. Yes, they should htfu and version interfaces like real men. But they're not going to, so either enforce your rule or don't. [1] - apparently ignorable when it's inconvenient, but let's not turn this into a sysfs argument. - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
