Unfortunately, this means to get rid of
$RADEON_CFLAGS
$RADEON_LDFLAGS
in other source files.
As I said I am no autotools expert, but if libdrm_intel does not need
any furher CFLAGS/LDFLAGS, why libdrm_radeon is different?
The benefit of "simplifying" would mean to have libdrm_{intel,radeon}
handled the same way in configure.ac.
I have sent a V2 of my proposals with really checking for
$LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED (keeping $RADEON_CFLAGS and $RADEON_LDFLAGS).
--
Sedat
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Luc Verhaegen <l...@skynet.be> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:16:03PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what do you think about this proposal?
>>
>> --
>> Sedat
>
> Makes _a_ _lot_ of sense.
>
> Luc Verhaegen.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
