On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Matthew W. S. Bell <matt...@bells23.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 08:49 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: >> No, its "designed" as is. We can't change it now as its ABI. We make sure >> we only use 32-bit handles anyways.
The thing is "unsigned int" is correct for the handles, they are defined to be 32-bit numbers no matter what system they are on, its the use of the void * that is actually the problem. Its probably not documented well anywhere, though I think the handles are 32-bit is written down somewhere. Dave. > > OK, is this documented anywhere, as I'd like to pull some of that into a > comment? (It appears, on a casual glance, that this type is not used in > the kernel ABI, but only in the libdrm, and associates?, ABI, so could > be changed if the SONAME got bumped and anyone cared.) > > Matthew > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > -- > _______________________________________________ > Dri-devel mailing list > Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
