In the original code there was a typo and we called kfree(pgraph->ctxprog)
two times instead of kfree(pgraph->ctxvals);

Also it's OK to pass NULL variables to kfree().  checkpatch.pl complains 
about this so I removed the checks.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <erro...@gmail.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_grctx.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_grctx.c
index 32f0e49..06642a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_grctx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_grctx.c
@@ -134,15 +134,11 @@ nouveau_grctx_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
        struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
        struct nouveau_pgraph_engine *pgraph = &dev_priv->engine.graph;
 
-       if (pgraph->ctxprog) {
-               kfree(pgraph->ctxprog);
-               pgraph->ctxprog = NULL;
-       }
+       kfree(pgraph->ctxprog);
+       pgraph->ctxprog = NULL;
 
-       if (pgraph->ctxvals) {
-               kfree(pgraph->ctxprog);
-               pgraph->ctxvals = NULL;
-       }
+       kfree(pgraph->ctxvals);
+       pgraph->ctxvals = NULL;
 }
 
 void

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to