[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13580391#comment-13580391
]
Jacques Nadeau commented on DRILL-36:
-------------------------------------
My experience is that logback is much better and more modern than log4j. It
also works well with logback lilith.
common already contains slf4j references.
exec.ref contains slf4j as well as logback and logback-test.xml, with
references for lilith if it is running.
See these places for more discussion of logback and its replacement of log4j:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/178215/log4j-vs-logback
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/178836/should-new-projects-use-logback-instead-of-log4j
> add slf4j and log4j
> -------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-36
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-36
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Sree Vaddi
> Labels: log4j, log4j.xml, slf4j, test
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> For the current active projects:
> common
> ref
> sqlparser
> add slf4j and log4j jars in pom.xml
> add log4j.xml for 'test', too.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
