Hi Jacques
sounds good!
will you still be able to post a link to your wip dist exec stuff
before the weekend?
really anxious to tinker with it.
Best
David
On Apr 12, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looks like most people can meet at 9am PST on Tuesday. Let's meet then.
>
> J
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Great idea.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:14 PM, David Alves <davidral...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> I took the liberty of creating a doodle for the hangout to
>>> (hopefully) make it easier to select a time suitable for everyone.
>>> The link is: http://www.doodle.com/t9b5n455utkpebi3
>>>
>>> Best
>>> David Alves
>>>
>>> On Apr 8, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Timothy Chen <tnac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm available anytime after 1:30 pm PST M/W, and 1-4 pm PST F.
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Given David's request to have everybody review whatever I share, let's
>>> do
>>>>> M/T/W of next week.. What times are people available?
>>>>>
>>>>> J
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Timothy Chen <tnac...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm open 2pm pst, see when Jacques is open.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 7, 2013, at 6:01 PM, David Alves <davidral...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll try to drop some of my work and thoughts on the list this
>> week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is great news!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As always with these things, everything takes longer than one would
>>>>>>>> like…
>>>>>>> Hopefully we can help and take of the workload.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am also thinking that it might be good to do a google hangout
>>>>>>>> brainstorming session soon around some of this stuff to help move
>>>>>>>> things along.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A google hangout is a good idea.
>>>>>>> Wednesday would be a good day for me, say 2PM PST, how about for
>>>>>> other people?
>>>>>>> I do think we should do it after we get a chance to take a look at
>>>>>> what you already have so that we're all in the same page.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 6, 2013, at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
>> jacques.dr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll try to drop some of my work and thoughts on the list this
>> week.
>>>>>>>> As always with these things, everything takes longer than one would
>>>>>>>> like...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am also thinking that it might be good to do a google hangout
>>>>>>>> brainstorming session soon around some of this stuff to help move
>>>>>>>> things along.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> J
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 6, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Lisen Mu <imm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to see what's the current status and future plan
>> on
>>>>>> in-mem
>>>>>>>>> data representation in the dist exec engine.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was previously going to do something about DataValue in
>> exec/ref.
>>>>>> However
>>>>>>>>> after some reading into previous discussions in the maillist and
>>> some
>>>>>> links
>>>>>>>>> in 'useful research' wiki page
>>>>>>>>> (vldb09-tutorial6.pdf<
>>>>> http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/2/vldb09-tutorial6.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> abadisigmod06.pdf<
>>>>>> http://cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/dna/papers/abadisigmod06.pdf>
>>>>>>>>> etc.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I found it non-trivial and crucial building block to build in-mem
>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>> structure. Incremental optimisation based on current DataValue
>> seems
>>>>> a
>>>>>> bad
>>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So what's your thought on this? If we could get a sketch, I would
>>>>> very
>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>> like to do something on this issue.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 6:31 AM, David Alves <
>> davidral...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a timeline on when we might get a
>>>>>>>>>> sketch of the dist execution engine.
>>>>>>>>>> As I mentioned before I have a little over a month to get
>>>>>>>>>> something working and I'm starting to get a bit worried.
>>>>>>>>>> I've been working in the parallel per region hbase scanner
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> soon I'll have something usable.
>>>>>>>>>> I can definitely put in a few hours working/helping on it if
>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> helps, but as previously suggested I'd rather not reinvent the
>>>>> wheel.
>>>>>>>>>> Right now I was thinking that something that plugs-in to the
>>>>>>>>>> reference implementation (i.e. would not require a stable SE
>> iface)
>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> be a nice start.
>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
