I put references onto DRILL-225 and noted that there is no strong voice for
a separate DISCLAIMER file.

David didn't cite any references so it is hard to check his assertion.

Not a release stopper in my view.


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can someone please point me at the place where the definitive list of rules
> around the incubator disclaimer are presented.  It seems to be a moving
> target.  See the three conflicting sets of statements below by Isabel, the
> wiki, and David.  Maybe I'm just missing where I should be reading?  I
> promise you, we're trying to get this right.  Someone please help...
>
> thanks,
> Jacques
>
>
> In the RC3 thread Isabel said:
>
> "Also the release should contain the incubator disclaimer e.g. in the
> README,
> Release notes or similar - see "The incubator disclaimer" in the above
> release management best practices."
>
> Checking the url [1] she pointed to,  I see only three references to the
> disclaimer.  None are particularly specific or helpful:
>
>    - TODO: the incubator requires that users are informed that the by
>    including a standard disclaimer. may be include in README, RELEASE_NOTES
>    DISCLAIMER. It is recommended that it is not included in NOTICES
>    - Check disclaimer is distributed TODO: link
>    - It is strongly recommended that the NOTICE contains only these legally
>    important contents. The incubator disclaimer is best placed in another
>    document.
>
>
> Now David Fisher is saying in DRILL-225
>
> "You need to have a file called DISCLAIMER. This is the incubator
> requirement. Having it in the README.md is nice, but if you want to
> generate an acceptable release it is supposed to be a separate file."
>
>
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Harri Kinnunen
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > I'll update the Wiki How-To.
> > >
> >
> > Good man!
> >
>

Reply via email to