Sounds like positive support. I'll go through and tag a set of candidate issues. One of the things I'll add to jira is making sure our binary tarball passes muster as we hit a snag last time on that. I'll report back here with a list of potential Jiras people can pitch in on.
Thanks everybody! On Jul 24, 2014 8:44 PM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Important to get frequent releases out. > > > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Aman Sinha <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 for monthly releases provided we can do more test automation and make > it > > convenient to run the full suite frequently :) > > > > Aman > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Timothy Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Looks like we're all onboard, Jacques are you going to tag issues for > 0.4 > > > then? > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Mehant Baid <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > +1 for monthly releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/24/14, 12:26 PM, Keys Botzum wrote: > > > >> > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > >> Keys > > > >> _______________________________________ > > > >> Keys Botzum > > > >> Senior Principal Technologist > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> 443-718-0098 > > > >> MapR Technologies > > > >> http://www.mapr.com > > > >> On Jul 24, 2014 2:40 PM, "Jinfeng Ni" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 for monthly release. It's a good idea to use the similar > approach > > as > > > >>> the > > > >>> other open source projects, and releasing monthly will make it > easier > > > for > > > >>> people in the community to try out Drill. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Julian Hyde < > [email protected]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Yeah, you could, but > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 1. People will start calling it “Drill 10” (cf Hive and - ugh - > > HBase) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 2. You will inevitably discover bugs in people’s code for parsing > > > >>>> version > > > >>>> strings. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Julian > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Jul 24, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Timothy Chen <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> I was under the impression we can always go to 0.10+ if we're not > > > ready > > > >>>> > > > >>>> :) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Tim > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Julian Hyde < > > [email protected]> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Optiq has been “approximately monthly”, and that seems to have > > > worked > > > >>>> > > > >>>> well. We weren’t tied to a particular date, so we could use our > > > >>> > > > >>> discretion > > > >>>> > > > >>>> to slip a bit if making a release wasn’t convenient. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Now Optiq faces a different crunch… the next release will be > 0.9, > > so > > > >>>> > > > >>>> there will be an expectation that the release after that will be > > “the > > > >>>> big > > > >>>> one”, i.e. 1.0. If you’re on a “early and often” cycle, no release > > > feels > > > >>>> like “the big one”. Hopefully you will feel like you’re at 1.0 > > quality > > > >>> > > > >>> well > > > >>>> > > > >>>> before December. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Julian > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Jul 24, 2014, at 9:16 AM, Parth Chandra < > [email protected] > > > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> +1 for monthly releases. > > > >>>>>>> We could follow the Ubuntu model and use the number of the > month > > > for > > > >>>> > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> minor version number . > > > >>>>>>> 0.07 for July, 0.08 for Aug, etc. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Yash Sharma < > [email protected]> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> +1. Would really love to see a release. > > > >>>>>>>> It would be great if we can have prioritized JIRA's - labelled > > > with > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 0.4 and > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> we can focus solely on those for this week. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Peace, > > > >>>>>>>> Yash > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau < > > > [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hey Everybody, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> It has been too long since our last release. So much good > > stuff > > > >>> > > > >>> has > > > >>>> > > > >>>> been > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> done in master but we have no release with which people can > > > >>>> > > > >>>> experiment. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> We > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> need to do a better job of releasing early and often. I > think > > > the > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> monthly > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> cycle that Optiq and Spark uses works very well and propose > we > > > move > > > >>>> > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> model. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> To kick this off, I propose we do a release next week that is > > our > > > >>>> > > > >>>> first > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> development point release that supports distributed > execution. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> There are > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> probably a dozen outstanding patches that would be good to > get > > > into > > > >>>> > > > >>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> release and I'd like to try to target those but ultimately > > > >>>> > > > >>>> time-bound the > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> release. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> With releasing comes a discussion of version numbers. While > we > > > >>>> > > > >>>> initially > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> started out with a milestone versioning scheme, the feedback > > I've > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> received > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> is that it doesn't fit what people expect. As such, I > propose > > > >>>> > > > >>>> moving to > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> more traditional point release scheme. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I think that we're probably a month or so away from a good > beta > > > >>>> > > > >>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> which I think would fairly be considered a 0.5 release. As > > > such, I > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> propose > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> that we release 0.4 next week and then increment each month, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> targeting a > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> 1.0 release towards the end of the year. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> In summary, my release proposal is to target something > similar > > > to: > > > >>>>>>>>> July: 0.4 (dev preview) > > > >>>>>>>>> August: 0.5 (beta) > > > >>>>>>>>> September: 0.6 > > > >>>>>>>>> Oct: 0.7 > > > >>>>>>>>> ... > > > >>>>>>>>> EOY: 1.0 (ga) > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I think this more frequent release will help users to > > understand > > > >>> > > > >>> what > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Drill > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> is all about and let them start to experiment with their > > > workloads. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> This > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> should also drive additional community engagement and new > > > >>>> > > > >>>> contributions > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> which is what this is all about. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>> Jacques > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
