To my untrained eyes, it looks better than what we have today. +1.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Timothy Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm in favor of the new website, it's a bit more clearer where it > stands and I like the diagrams. > > Our current website has good big bold points but the diagrams are a > bit too complex I think. > > I wasn't sure why we don't highlight the speed part? > > I think it's an improvement however, +1 > > Tim > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > > > MapR marketing was kind enough to put together a refresh to the existing > > Drill website to go along with the 0.4 release. I think that the changes > > do a great job of better representing the what and why of Drill and I > > suggest we post them. > > > > Rather than getting into a long discussion about subjective design > > aesthetics, I propose that you answer one simple question: "*Is this an > > improvement over what we have today?*" If you do, let's post it. > > > > Once posted, for those that are really motivated (as opposed to just > having > > a passing interest), additional JIRAs can be opened and people can raise > > their hand to contribute additional improvements. This way we won't get > > mired in this discussion when there are so many other important things on > > which we should focus. > > > > How does that sound? > > > > You can find the updated pages here: > > http://shlshk.com/apachedrill/content/drill/index.html > > > > thanks, > > Jacques >
