Jacques Nadeau created DRILL-1274:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Update License file to correctly identify source
inclusions versus binary inclusions
Key: DRILL-1274
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-1274
Project: Apache Drill
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Tools, Build & Test
Reporter: Jacques Nadeau
Issues found with last release:
- LICENSE file is not correct - looks like quite a few things need to be
removed as they are not actually bundled in the source artefact. The LICENSE
file in the source artefact should only reference software that is actually
bundled in the source release.
- LICENSE file doesn't need to contain references to Apache licensed software
only MIT and BSD software. Each bundled Apache software may modify the NOTICE
file.
- LICENSE issue "The compiled Apache Drill distribution includes the following
sources/binaries." is incorrect as a source distribution shouldn't normally
contain binaries.
- LICENSE refers to CDDL licensed, CPL licensed, EPL licensed and MPL licensed
software - all which are category B licences. Are these actually included in
the source release and if so how? And if they are included why are they not in
the NOTICE file (as per [2]) If not included why are these mentioned in the the
LICENCES file at all?
I think the issue is we're using the same license file for both source and
binary tarballs. We need to separate these out.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
