Excellent idea, I was just about to ask where I could pitch in :) Thanks, Matt
Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tim, can you provide everybody an overview of what functionality your > current patch provides? Maybe we can break remaining requirements into > tasks and have everyone work on a piece to get completed soon. > > Thanks > Jacques >> On Sep 14, 2014 7:06 AM, "Timothy Chen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> I'm also working on window functions (Yash is interested helping) and we >> should work together. I already have a first patch that provides a physical >> operator but now going to build on top of it to provide more flexible >> ground work for different window functions and offets configurations. >> >> Tim >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Sep 14, 2014, at 7:53 AM, Matt Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm looking at some windowing functions (starting with rank functions >> like row_number, rank, and dense_rank) right now, not sure if those count >> as analytic functions for this discussion or not... >>> >>> Regards, >>> Matt >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Sep 14, 2014, at 2:28 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Uli, >>>> >>>> Which analytics functions do you mean? >>>> >>>> Does this impression of high priority mean that you are willing to work >> on >>>> these analytics functions? >>>> >>>> Michael is offering to implement these functions for his own >> edification. >>>> That is a great thing. Could you provide some guidance about which >>>> functions you think would be more useful with some examples of why you >>>> think so? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Uli Bethke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My personal opinion is that analytic functions should take a much >> higher >>>>> priority. No analytics database engine can live without these. In my >>>>> opinion anything that you can do with ROLLUP/CUBE you can do with >> analytic >>>>> functions while the opposite is not true. >>>>> >>>>> Uli >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 13/09/2014 18:57, Michael Johnson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> For an advanced databases class project, I'm looking at adding CUBE >> and >>>>>> ROLLUP operators to Drill. (I'll be working up to that by trying out >> some >>>>>> smaller changes first to get a better understanding of Drill's code.) >>>>>> >>>>>> Does this sound like a feature that you might want to incorporate into >>>>>> Drill? Any other thoughts about this idea? >>>>>> >>>>>> Michael >>
