-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25925/#review54250
-----------------------------------------------------------



exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/DirPathBuilder.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25925/#comment94264>

    Why do you choose 5 as a magic number here?
    
    Seems to me we will not run into problem, even if we do not specify the max 
number, since the code uses ArrayList() ?



exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/DirPathBuilder.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25925/#comment94266>

    Since MAX_NESTED_SUBDIRS = 5, if query has dir7 = "yyy", will this query 
hit assertion error?



exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/DirPathBuilder.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25925/#comment94265>

    If MAX_NESTED_SUBDIRS = 5, does it mean only filter with dir0 ~ dir4 will 
be qualified for pushdown?



exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/DrillPushPartitionFilterIntoScan.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25925/#comment94263>

    Will it better to add a new method (i.e., supportPartitionFilter() ) to 
StoragePlugin, in stead of using the StoragePlugin's name as a criteria whether 
this rule will be fired or not?


- Jinfeng Ni


On Sept. 22, 2014, 9:36 p.m., Aman Sinha wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25925/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 22, 2014, 9:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for drill and Jinfeng Ni.
> 
> 
> Bugs: DRILL-1386
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-1386
> 
> 
> Repository: drill-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> 
> Suppose we have following directory hierarchy for either Parquet or JSON 
> format: 
>  orders/2012/Jan...Dec, orders/2013/Jan...Dec, orders/2014/Jan...Dec}
> In this patch we attempt to push the following types of filters (More types 
> of filters will be added in the future):
>       1. SELECT * FROM <path>/orders WHERE o_custkey = 5 AND dir0 = '2014' 
> AND dir1 = 'June'
>       2. SELECT * FROM <path>/orders WHERE (dir0 = '2013' AND dir1 = 'June') 
> OR (dir0 = '2014' AND dir1 = 'June')
> For (1) dirPath =  <path>/orders/2014/June
> For (2) there are 2 dirPaths: {<path>/orders/2013/June, 
> <path>/orders/2014/June}
> 
> A new rule DrillPushPartitionFilterIntoScan has been added which makes use of 
> a helper class DirPathBuilder. 
> There are couple of pending issues that need to be resolved based on testing. 
>    
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/base/AbstractFileGroupScan.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/base/FileGroupScan.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/common/DrillScanRelBase.java
>  0934818 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/DirPathBuilder.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/DrillPushPartitionFilterIntoScan.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/DrillRuleSets.java
>  dbb85b2 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/planner/logical/DrillScanRel.java
>  5a0cc08 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/store/dfs/easy/EasyGroupScan.java
>  8efcd2c 
>   
> exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/store/parquet/ParquetGroupScan.java
>  86e5224 
>   exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/TestExampleQueries.java 
> c54772f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25925/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> New manual tests in TestExampleQueries; these are not automated yet due to 
> the fact that directory hierarchies have to be created.  
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aman Sinha
> 
>

Reply via email to