I think Jacques is probably right and Lazy Consensus is better. I have not experienced a crisis where a commit is contentious, so it’s hypothetical for me. Changing my vote:
0 (binding) Julian On Oct 7, 2014, at 9:14 AM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > I've given this some more thought and I think should fall back to Lazy > Conesus on code commits. Given that the community is still young and we > have okay but not great diversity, I think it would be best if we made sure > that smaller contingents in the community are heard. I prefer to be > conservative in making sure each voice is heard early in the development of > Drill. If we find that the project becomes gridlocked by this, it would be > reasonable to update the bylaws to use a lazy majority fallback instead. > > As such, I'm leaning towards a negative vote on the current bylaws. That > said, I'd like to hear from others on how they feel about this. Thoughts > people? > > Jacques > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Steven Phillips <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Lazy Majority seems fine to me. Do we really want to allow a single >> dissenting vote to hold up needed changes? >> >> It's possible at some point there me be a split in the community over the >> direction that Drill should take, and requiring consensus could result in >> the project coming to a stand still. >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I just got back after vacation so haven't had a chance to get caught up >> on >>> email. >>> >>> What was the thinking of using Lazy approval > Lazy Majority versus using >>> Lazy Approval > Lazy Consensus for code changes? >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Tomer Shiran <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> In order for Drill to graduate to a TLP, we need to finalize the >>> project's >>>> bylaws. Here's the latest proposal that has been shared/discussed on >> this >>>> list: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DRILL/Proposed+Bylaws >>>> >>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. It will close on Oct 9, 4pm PT. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 >>>> >>>> Please indicate whether your vote is binding or non-binding. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tomer >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Steven Phillips >> Software Engineer >> >> mapr.com >>
