The document should have had that sentence removed so that there's no difference between merge scenario and normal commit scenario. I fixed it now.
I assume everyone else voted based on the assumption that this was removed, as it was discussed on the list, so I won't restart the vote unless someone really wants to. Anyone can, of course, change their vote prior to the vote closing. On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > Tomer said that it makes sense to remove ", unless the code change > represents a merge from a branch, in which case three +1s are required” but > the bylaws still contain that clause. > > -1 (non-binding) > > Julian > > > On Oct 9, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tomer Shiran <[email protected]> wrote: > > In order for Drill to graduate to a TLP, we need to finalize the project's > bylaws. I am restarting the vote here based on the feedback and discussions > on the list: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DRILL/Proposed+Bylaws > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. It will close on Oct 12, 3pm PT. I will > then send out the TLP graduation vote. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > Please indicate whether your vote is binding or non-binding. > > Thanks, > Tomer >
