Steven Stallion wrote:
>> Yes, a follow up putback would be fine for Brussels.
>>
>
> Ah, great!
>
> I'm starting on support for Brussels now - at first blush it looks pretty
> straightforward. I'm hoping to have this finished up by this weekend.
>
> Which properties should I target initially, I assume there should be
> support for the various MII properties and the ones supported by dnet as
> it exists now (there are only a few). Are there others I should be aware
> of?
>
For dnet, I'd just worry about the MII ones. You can look at afe to see
the "standard set". (There are some others, such as link pause -- but
most dnet devices won't have pause support anyway - they're just too
darned old. :-)
> Is there anything else I need to do on the GLDv3 patch to keep things moving?
>
No, I need to review it, and unfortunately, I'm pretty well saturated
right now. I *will* review your changes soon, promise.
-- Garrett
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>
_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
driver-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
