On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:26:55 +0200, Milan Jurik <milan.ju...@sun.com> wrote: > Nothing against it if we have some driver available. There are not many > tulip cards flying around probably (I have one or two which are used for > testing before RTIs) but it is also used as virtual device in one > virtualization tool (Hyper-V), so it is still important driver. > > The question is - how long will it take to have good replacement? Will > it be more stable and in better quality? > > One thing I never understood - did you dnet updates brought new > regressions or were you trying to solve all dnet bugs (which is not > possible probably)?
No regressions at all - in fact, a number of existing regressions were fixed ;) I was trying to get all of the bugs worked out as best I could - some of those were contributing to occaisional vlan and aggr failures in NICDRV. Steve -- Yet magic and hierarchy arise from the same source, and this source has a null pointer. Reference the NULL within NULL, it is the gateway to all wizardry. _______________________________________________ driver-discuss mailing list driver-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
