On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote:
> I have introduced lradc_reg_set() and lradc_reg_clear().  It simplifies
> the callers and makes the lines shorter.

Looks good, just one minor suggestion:

> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c 
> b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index a08c173..da5d04b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,16 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
>  #define LRADC_RESOLUTION                       12
>  #define LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK               ((1 << LRADC_RESOLUTION) - 1)
>
> +static void lradc_reg_set(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val, size_t chan)
> +{
> +       writel(val, lradc->base + chan + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> +}
> +
> +static void lradc_reg_clear(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val, size_t chan)
> +{
> +       writel(val, lradc->base + chan + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> +}

Maybe 'static inline' ?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to