Hi Marek, On Tuesday 10 September 2013 10:22:36 Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Monday 09 September 2013 18:04:19 Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > Distinguish i.MX23 and i.MX28 at runtime and do the same for both SoC > > > > at least for the 4 wire touchscreen. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <j...@pengutronix.de> > > > > CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > > > > CC: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org > > > > CC: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> > > > > CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> > > > > CC: Jonathan Cameron <ji...@cam.ac.uk> > > > > > > This patch seems to combine two things -- register access rework AND > > > adjustment of the driver for MX23 touchscreen. > > > > It reworks the register access to avoid the i.MX23/i.MX28 runtime > > decision all over the code again and again. This is what Dan has > > recommended in his comment. > > Sure, but this change should be separated from fixing the touchscreen > support then.
Hmm, but there is no need to rework the register access until the i.MX23 touchscreen support is added. So this patch does both at the same time. > > > Btw the MX23 ADC was already supported, > > > > No. This patch is the first in this series which brings in the specific > > register bits, because the ADC units in the i.MX23 and i.MX28 differ. > > > > > so this "add i.MX23 support" commit message is not accurate. > > > > Hmmm, what else do you think should I write? > > You're just correcting the touchscreen support, no ? Okay, will change the subject. Regards, Juergen -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
