Dear Jürgen Beisert, > Hi Jonathan, > > On Sunday 15 September 2013 12:56:25 Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On 09/11/13 09:18, Juergen Beisert wrote: > > > For battery driven systems it is a very bad idea to collect the > > > touchscreen data within a kernel busy loop. > > > > > > This change uses the features of the hardware to delay and accumulate > > > samples in hardware to avoid a high interrupt and CPU load. > > > > > > Note: this is only tested on an i.MX23 SoC yet. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <j...@pengutronix.de> > > > CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > > > CC: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org > > > CC: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> > > > CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> > > > CC: Jonathan Cameron <ji...@cam.ac.uk> > > > > While this driver is placed in IIO within staging at the moment, these > > changes are definitely input related. Hence I have cc'd Dmitry and the > > input list. > > > > I am personaly a little uncomfortable that we have such a complex bit of > > input code sat within an IIO driver but such is life. > > Maybe an MFD for this ADC unit would be a better way to go? Currently I > have a different problem with this driver, because the ADC unit monitors > the battery as well. And the charging driver from the power subsystem > needs these values to charge the battery in a correct manner.
Are you planning to post the power block patches too ? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
