> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:10 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Dan Carpenter; o...@aepfle.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org;
> jasow...@redhat.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; vojt...@suse.cz; linux-
> in...@vger.kernel.org; a...@canonical.com; de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: input: serio: New driver to support Hyper-V
> synthetic keyboard
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:56:03PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:06 AM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: o...@aepfle.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; jasow...@redhat.com;
> > > dmitry.torok...@gmail.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> vojt...@suse.cz;
> > > linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; a...@canonical.com;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: input: serio: New driver to support 
> > > Hyper-V
> > > synthetic keyboard
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:46:24PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > > > +                   case VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND:
> > > > > > +                           hv_kbd_on_receive(device, desc);
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the error handling I mentioned at the top.  
> > > > > hv_kbd_on_receive()
> > > > > doesn't take into consideration the amount of data we recieved, it
> > > > > trusts the offset we recieved from the user.  There is an out of 
> > > > > bounds
> > > > > read.
> > > >
> > > > What user are you referring to. The message is sent by the host - the 
> > > > user
> > > keystroke
> > > > is normalized into a fixed size packet by the host and sent to the  
> > > > guest. We
> will
> > > parse this
> > > > packet, based on the host specified layout here.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The user means the hypervisor, yes.
> > >
> > > I don't want the hypervisor accessing outside of the buffer.  It is
> > > robustness issue.  Just check the offset against "bytes_recvd".  It's
> > > not complicated.
> >
> > At the outset, let me apologize for not understanding your concern.
> > You say: " I don't want the hypervisor accessing outside of the buffer"
> > Where did you see the hypervisor accessing anything outside the buffer?
> > The buffer is allocated by this driver and a packet from vmbus is read into 
> > this
> > buffer - this is the call to vmbus_recvpacket(). If the specified buffer is 
> > smaller
> > than the packet that needs to be read, then nothing will be read. Once the 
> > read
> > completes, we can be sure we have read a valid packet and can proceed to
> parse it in
> > this driver.
> 
> The concern is that number of bytes received and contents of a packet
> are not in sync. Imagine if we were told that 16 butes was received but
> in the packet offset is 78. Then we'll try reading well past the buffer
> boundary that we allocated for the packets.

I am not sure how this would be the case. Following are the semantics of the 
function
vmbus_recvpacket_raw():

If the packet to be read is larger than the buffer specified; nothing will be 
read and 
appropriate error is returned. If a  packet is read, the complete packet is 
read and 
so we can safely peek into this packet based on the information in the header.

Regards,


K. Y
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to